RiskCompli

← All insights

Industry News By SafeCompli · 19 August 2026

AI on a CV is fine. Leaving the prompt in it is not

Originally published on SafeCompli, our parent brand. Reproduced here for RiskCompli readers.

I’m hiring at the moment.

One CV landed with something I didn’t expect: Gemini had left its own notes in the document. The original prompt. The “considerations.” Sitting in the CV itself.

It didn’t put me off because someone used AI. I use AI every day. If the core qualifications and competencies are genuine, fair enough.

What raised the eyebrow was simpler. They hadn’t read their own CV before they sent it.

What IOSH Jobs is saying

On 16 July 2026, IOSH Jobs published “Can AI help you land your next health and safety job?”

The useful bits, stripped of the brochure language:

That last line is the one that matches what landed in my inbox.

Why it matters in health and safety

This profession runs on trust and competence. People expect you to notice the awkward detail: the wrong date on a permit, the missing control on a risk assessment, the sentence that does not match what actually happens on site.

Sending a CV with the AI scaffolding still visible is the same family of mistake. Not evil. Not automatically dishonest. Just a loud signal that the final check did not happen.

A simple rule of thumb

Assuming the quals are real, I am still interested in the person. I am less interested in the person who never opened the file one last time.

Source

Have you seen the same thing when hiring, or on the other side when applying?

If the feed keeps burying useful stuff under someone else’s “excited to announce”, the mailing list is less chaotic: https://safecompli.co.uk/subscribe?src=linkedin

On a side note: you can now try RiskCompli FREE, no card needed: riskcompli.safecompli.co.uk

www.safecompli.co.uk